References
[1] The following paper coined the term coupled software transformations and listed a number of transformation scenarios that were not related to each other at that time: Ralf Lämmel: “Coupled Software Transformations”; First International Workshop on Software Evolution Transformations (SETS 2004). Available online.
[2] The following paper surveys the landscape of bidirectional transformations (BX) based on presentations and discussions on the BX Grace Seminar in Japan in December 2008: Krzysztof Czarnecki, J. Nathan Foster, Zhenjiang Hu, Ralf Lämmel, Andy Schürr, and James F. Terwilliger: “Bidirectional Transformations: A Cross-Discipline Perspective”. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Model Transformation (ICMT 2009). While the paper focuses on BX, it also mentions coupled software transformations that are not BX. (There has also been a follow-up meeting to the BX Grace Seminar: the BX Dagstuhl Seminar 11031.)
[3] STBenchmark: this is a publicly available benchmark for testing and evaluating "mapping systems". STBenchmark is the product of a collaborative effort between the University of California Santa-Cruz and the University of Trento. STBenchmark consists of a basic suite of mapping scenarios, a mapping scenario generator as well as an instance generator, and a usability model that can be used as a first-cut measure on the use of a mapping system. STBenchmark may inspire the efforts at CSXW 2011 to derive a benchmark for bidirectional and coupled software transformations.
[4] Miscellaneous:
- The Schema Evolution Benchmark
- The 101companies software corpus
- Comparison of Three Model Transformation Languages
- Comparing Libraries For Generic Programming In Haskell
- A Comparison of Taxonomies for Model Transformation Languages
- Applying a Model Transformation Taxonomy to Graph Transformation Technology